They all claim not.
Consider the following and then you decide.
April 23, 2000
Dr. Michael Borack released his 1st PAS Report.
Dr. Borack did not inform anyone that he is not expert in assessing child sexual abuse. Despite that, incredibly and unethically, Dr. Borack ordered two children to be deprogrammed, as if they had been brainwashed into believing they were abused. No true expert has ever said the children were coached.
June 2000
The mother writes a letter to the father asking him to stop physically bathing their nearly eight year old son, as the boy was upset with these bathing sessions.
Well that was a mistake. Never ask a suspected child molester to stop physically bathing his nearly eight year old son if there is a PAS Court in the same county.
See Hamilton County's Easy Four Step Process For Coercing Cincinnati Mothers Into Giving Up Custodial Rights To Abusers
Ron Panioto's Easy Four Step Guide To Sobering Up Protective Mothers
Step One
The Alleged Abuser's Motion
July 6, 2000
Because of the bathtub allegation, which was never investigated and assumed to be false, (because PAS psychologist Dr. Michael Borack labeled the mother an alienator), the alleged abuser's attorney - Dominic Mastruserio, filed with the Panioto Court the following motion asking the court to reinvolve the notoriously fabricating Dr. Michael Borack.
Step Three
The Panioto Court's 2nd PAS Report
August 15, 2000
Dr. Michael Borack releases his 2nd PAS Report.
The court appointed PAS psychologist Dr. Michael Borack did not address the question of whether the eight year old boy was being molested in the bathtub by his father? Harvard professor Dr. Gerald Koocher stated that Borack's report screams for an investigation of the allegation - but none was forthcoming. At age eight and articulate, the boy would have been able to speak for himself - if only a qualified person would interview him. The bathtub allegation was the pretext used in Mr. Mastruserio's motion to the court.
Dr. Borack did not report the allegation to Children Services. The non-expert in child sexual abuse, Dr. Borack, would weeks later specifically order Drs. Boat & Olafson not to conduct sexual abuse evaluations, but rather, to deprogram the children. This website believes that Dr. Michael Borack should lose his license for not reporting what Mr. Mastruserio called "sexual improprieties". Borack is a mandatory reporter of sexual abuse allegations, yet he did everything possible to scuttle the boy's complaint.
Dr. Borack's second set of recommendations were more oppressive than his first set. Borack was punishing the mother for alleging that her son was being inappropriately touched by his father in the bathtub. Here's how some of that reads (imagine your reaction were this directed at you).
Borack's 2nd PAS Report
Full Custody For The Father And
De-Program The Children
Michael Borack excerpt 8-15-00 quoting his original statement
" 'The objectives of this intervention will be to de-program the children in regard to their father,...' "
Michael Borack excerpt 8-15-00
"Specific Recommendations:
1). I continue to recommend the treatment plan outlined in my prior report.
2). I recommend that (the father) be temporarily awarded fully legal custody of both children pending changes on the part of (the mother).
3). 
I recommend that (the mother's) parents and siblings be prevented from having any contact with the children during the treatment period.
4). I recommend that (the mother's) parenting time be pared down to less than fifty percent until progress is reported by Dr's Boat and Olafson.
5). I recommend that both parents enjoy a right to first refusal regarding parenting time when the other is unavailable for a period of more than eight hours.
6). I recommend that the involved clinicians be required to read both of these reports."
Step Four
Signing Away Rights
August 31, 2000
Crying, distraught and feeling she had a Borack gun to her head, and with her attorney having no strategy to attack Dr. Borack's reports, and warning that Panioto would adopt Borack's PAS recommendations in their entirety, the mother signed the 2nd Shared Parenting Agreement giving the alleged abuser custodial rights, the majority of visitation time and no child support.
Not wanting to lose her children forever to an abuser, the mother claims that the Panioto PAS Court left her no choice but to sign. Part of the sales pitch is that it is "temporary".
Well, the six months temporary turned into forever. There is nothing temporary about temporary! Be careful about signing anything sold as "temporary". Don't do it!!!
So there you have it - in 4 easy steps!
Custody To The Abuser
Limited Visitation For The Protective Parent
No Child Support
The Hamilton County PAS Domestic Relations Court would have you believe that this mother fighting for her children voluntarily gave away custodial rights and more to the abuser without any coercion from them. Can you believe that?
While hiding the Borack reports, they say ...
She signed voluntarily. 
She signed voluntarily.
She signed voluntarily. 
Bullshit!
But wait ... there's more.
Hamilton County Has A Bonus 5th Step
Step 
Five
Hide The PAS Reports If She Appeals
The Hamilton County Domestic Relations Court (Paniotos) unethically refused to supplement the official record to the Appeals Court with their PAS reports and recommendations (which they paid for) when the mother appealed. These guys are animals.
Officially - and technically - and irrationally - according to them, the whole sorry episode never happened.
But it did happen.
And probably does a lot.
And we're tellin'.
"This cause came in for hearing and for hearing are Plaintiff's motion for an update to be performed by Dr. Michael Borack. Should Dr. Borack recommend 6 months therapy the Trial will be reset. If Dr. Borack's recommendation changes as a result of the update, the Trial date will proceed on August 21 and August 23rd, 2000.