Dr. Michael Borack

PAS Reports

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"

"DE-PROGRAM
THE
CHILDREN"

Dr. Michael Borack is Judge Ronald Panioto's neighbor and Court Appointed Parental Alienation Syndrome expert. As such, his opinion was inappropriately afforded tremendous weight by Panioto's PAS Court. Eighteen months after his original report and only after failing to quash his deposition, Dr. Michael Gene Borack finally admitted in deposition:

"I'm not an expert, a specialist, in assessing children as to whether or not they've been sexually abused."

Up until that deposition moment, Dr. Michael Borack had bluffed his way through the entire Thibodeaux family evaluation.

Borack had absolutely no business being involved in this or any other child sexual abuse evaluation. Hamilton County has appointed Borack in nearly 30 other child custody evaluation cases affecting nearly 100 Cincinnati children. His career from Boston to Cincinnati to Kentucky and soforth is checkered with unethical conduct. Unethical potholes everywhere. He is reckless and destructive.

As the "court appointed" evaluator in this case, Michael Borack single-handedly reversed a true child sexual abuse expert, Dr. Jacqueline Kowalski, who had concluded with "psychological certainty" that the father in this case had abused his daughter.

Possessing no ability to assess child abuse, Borack commanded two Cincinnati child therapists, Drs. Barbara Boat & Erna Olafson, to "de-program" the children, as if they had been brainwashed into believing they were abused. When the therapists balked, Borack attempted to intimidate them.

On this page, read below the non-expert in child sexual abuse - though expert in PAS - Dr. Michael Borack bully his way through the case. What is sad for these children is that Borack and the court (read Panioto) failed to protect these children for over four years, and most of the following Borack recommendations were in effect from September 2000 until November 2004.

"The objectives of this intervention will be to de-program the children in regard to their father,..."

"I strongly urge the Court to communicate to (the mother) beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is not a bluff. I believe only a fear of losing her children will shake (the mother) out of her current frame of mind. I also very much believe that if she can not shake it, then allowing the children to remain in her care will do them much more harm than good."

"1). I recommend a six month period of intervention during which shared parenting is continued and (the father's) visitation is unsupervised.

2). During that six month period the children and parents in this family engage in services detailed above.

3). I recommend a copy of this report be provided to all mental health or supervising professionals working with any member of this family."

The protective mother, stung by the court PAS evaluator Michael Borack's April 2000 reports, wrote a very politely worded letter to the suspected child molester asking him to stop physically bathing their 7 1/2 year old son. These bathing sessions were traumatic for the boy, who begged his mother to do something. Despite kissing the ass of an abuser (try doing that even once) the letter backfired against the protective mother as his attorney Dominic Mastruserio and PAS court evaluator Dr. Michael Borack combined to squelch further allegations. Borack could and should lose his license for the way he handled this allegation.

"The father gave me a copy of the letter, (which was later supplied by [the mother's] counsel). It reads,

'(The boy) has also said, 'I have asked Dad four times to not give me baths anymore but he does not listen to me.' (The boy) has been taking showers at my residence for nearly two years and is capable of washing his private parts without assistance. Please allow (the boy) to take showers. The only thing he needs help with is the water temperature. (The boy) is approaching his eighth birthday and his right to privacy ought to be respected.'"

Michael Borack's 2nd Report
August 15, 2000

The father's attorney Dominic Mastruserio used the bathtub allegation to reinvolve Panioto's PAS evaluator Michael Borack. Sure enough, Borack did not report the allegation as mandated by law to Children Services. Nor did Borack investigate it himself - he couldn't - he wasn't expert, though he told no one about that. Instead Borack used the bathtub allegation as the pretext for yet another punishing round of recommendations against the mother which will be shown later below.

According to Dr. Gerald Koocher, an Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School, former Chief Psychologist at Boston's Children's Hospital, former Vice-Chairman of the APA Ethics Committee and currently a member of the APA Board of Directors who co-authored a 544 page book on Ethics, Dr. Michael Borack's August 2000 PAS report "screams" for a follow-up to the bathtub allegation. But Borack writes nothing about it.

Instead Borack unethically demanded that the children be deprogrammed.

" 'The objectives of this intervention will be to de-program the children in regard to their father,...' "

Michael Borack excerpt August 15, 2000

"Specific Recommendations:

1). I continue to recommend the treatment plan outlined in my prior report.

2). I recommend that (the father) be temporarily awarded fully legal custody of both children pending changes on the part of (the mother).

3). I recommend that (the mother's) parents and siblings be prevented from having any contact with the children during the treatment period.

4). I recommend that (the mother's) parenting time be pared down to less than fifty percent until progress is reported by Dr's Boat and Olafson.

5). I recommend that both parents enjoy a right to first refusal regarding parenting time when the other is unavailable for a period of more than eight hours.

6). I recommend that the involved clinicians be required to read both of these reports."

Whom Do We
De-program Today?

Barbara Boat, Ph.D
Erna Olafson, Ph.D., Psy.D.

September 15, 2000

Here is their co-authored excerpt declining Borack's instruction to deprogram the children:

"We request that the Amended Shared Parenting Plan delete the term 'deprogram' ..."

"We will make treatment decisions based upon our professional judgment."

They knew Borack was a screw-up from the get-go.

On The Road To Her Deprogramming ...

The Little Girl Discloses Twice More

"On two occasions (October and early December, 2000) (the little girl) reported to her mother that her father touched her vagina. According to (the mother) on both occasions she asked no questions of (the little girl). I interviewed (the little girl). There was not sufficient information from either interview to report to Children's Services. Indeed, (the little girl) said that one of the touching events happened when she was three and that now she is four years old."

Barbara W. Boat, Ph.D
excerpt 2-22-01

"In October, and again in December, (the little girl) made statements about possible sexual touching by her father."

Erna Olafson, Ph.D., Psy.D.
Barbara W. Boat, Ph.D.
2-26-01 co-authored excerpt

Webmaster Comments -

Was the disclosure to Dr. Boat in October 2000 that the girl had been abused while 3 years old the same allegations of abuse reported to Dr. Kowalski in December 1999? Not likely.

Did Dr. Boat mishandle the girl's disclosure because of pressure from Michael Borack? Most certainly.

Look at the calendar below and see the many months (eight) the girl was 3 years old after last visiting and disclosing Dr. Kowalski.

1999 December The 3 yr. old girl discloses to expert Dr. Kowalski that she was sexually molested by "daddy"	2000 January One month Barbara.	¬Ý2000 February Two months Barbara.
2000 March Three months Barbara.	2000 April Four months Barbara.	2000 May Five months Barbara.
2000 June Six months Barbara.	2000 July Seven months Barbara.	2000 August Eight months Barbara. Finally not 3 - she turned 4

Eight Months Barbara!

The abused little girl had been three years old for an additional eight months after her last visit with Dr. Kowalski. So how could Dr. Boat know that the non-coached "sexual touching" that she was now hearing, which happened when the girl was three, was not a new allegation of abuse? She couldn't know. And she didn't try to find out. And she didn't report it as mandated by law to Children Services.

This whole business of gee, "one of the touching events happened when she was three and that now she is four years old" is really rather stupid. Is it okay to be molested at three years old? It's hard to make sense of Boat's bizarre statement or follow her reasoning process. This is what happens when a cancer (i.e. Borack) is introduced into the process. Borack had sternly warned Drs. Boat & Olafson not to let their "de-programming" and "intervention" "devolve" into another investigation. What an incredibly odd thing for a non-expert to advise true experts.

Most likely because of this website's exposure of both the renegade Borack and Zuberbuhler's PAS parenting division, Dr. Boat and every other child abuse expert in Cincinnati now refuse any involvement with Hamilton County's PAS court. Panioto laments that. We say he has himself to blame.

Dr. Boat ignored a subpoena at the mistrial in February 2004 because of illness and again in October 2004 because of ... well we don't know why? Even though she knew about the final trial, her attorney said that she was in North Carolina. Was she hiding? We think so. Did Dr. Boat allow the non-expert Borack to influence her therapy sessions and now cannot adequately explain herself to a judge? Sure looks that way.

Did Borack's commands and tirades derail a true investigation of child sexual abuse? Was Borack fearful that Drs. Boat & Olafson would validate the abuse allegations? Indeed, if handled properly, which it most certainly was not, the girl's disclosures should have vindicated the mother one month after losing custody to the abuser, who then went on to maintain custody.

How seriously did Dr. Boat take the girl's disclosures? Very seriously. Just as Dr. Kowalski had done before her, Boat tested the child for coaching and determined that she had not been.

Borack's so-called deprogramming and intervention stopped on a dime. However, when it came time to write a recommendation, Dr. Boat claimed that because everybody was now getting along so well that an "unorthodox" 50/50 arrangement would work. Hellooooo? Are you daft?

While it would be easy to suggest that Borack's incessant pressure influenced Boat's "unorthodox" position, the fact of the matter is that in another highly contentious custody battle in South Carolina, Dr. Barbara Boat recommended exactly the same thing ... 50/50. The unorthodox appears more orthodox. Call her fifty-fifty Barbara. Expert at getting disclosures and absolutely clueless what to do next.

He Comes Undone -

Borack Says Supervise The Mother

Within days after learning that the little girl had disclosed possible sexual abuse to the very people assigned to deprogram her, Dr. Michael Borack wrote in a hissy fit diatribe the following PAS recommendations:

" 'I recommend that ... Barbara Boat, Ph.D., and Erna Olafson Ph.D.... work with these children ... The objectives of this intervention will be to de-program the children in regard to their father,...' "

"Drs. Boat and Olafson are also being asked to work with the (redacted) children to assuage any fears and dissuade any false beliefs they might have acquired about their father as a result of their mother's long-term campaign against him."

"I recommend that all contact between (the mother) or her family members and the involved minor children be supervised by a neutral professional until the Court has the opportunity to investigate this matter further."

Mr. Thibodeaux Cancels

The Children's Next Appointment

And Never Brings 'em Back

The alleged abuser Mr. Thibodeaux canceled the next scheduled appointment the children had with Drs. Boat & Olafson. Never again would Dr. Thibodeaux return with the children to the court recommended therapists Boat & Olafson. He failed to fully co-operate with Panioto's court. There is no penalty for that. Panioto is there to help, not hurt, alleged abusers.

He's not stupid.

Drs. Boat & Olafson Say

"An Excellent Mother"

"At every session, we have observed that the children are securely attached to their mother and comfortable with her. (The mother) is a very competent, warm, and attentive caretaker, and she is clear and consistent about setting limits when necessary."

"Dr. Boat and I have observed that (the mother) is an excellent mother, ..."
"A Note About Honesty -
It has been my clinical impression that (the mother) has been honest and truthful in what she has said to me."

Erna Olafson, Ph.D., Psy.D.
Barbara W. Boat, Ph.D
2-26-01 co-authored excerpt

The two favorable reports for the mother by Drs. Boat & Olafson were lost or misplaced by the Hamilton County Domestic Relations Court for nearly two weeks. The reports contradicted Dr. Borack and were nowhere to be found? They were ultimately found in the unethical Ron Panioto's chambers.

After six months of direct involvement, Dr. Erna Olafson was ordered by Michael Borack not to write a report to the PAS Panioto Court.

The non-expert in child sexual abuse, Dr. Borack, was annoyed that the expert in child sexual abuse, Dr. Olafson, was finding in favor of the mother in this case. Can't have that. So Dr. Borack insultingly accused Dr. Olafson of being manipulated by the mother, just as he had accused Dr. Kowalski of the same. (But the incompetent Borack was not being manipulated by Mr. Thibodeaux, was he?)

The PAS psychologist Dr. Michael Borack unethically sought to silence a strong opinion contrary to his own.

To somewhat get around this obstacle, Dr. Barbara Boat co-authored a report with Dr. Olafson and then penned one of her own.

It is unknown what a solo Dr. Erna Olafson report might read like if not handcuffed by the unethical Panioto Court psychologist, Dr. Michael Borack.

Hey - She Owes The PAS Guy Money

For That PAS ... errrr ... Report

"As an aside, I received a letter from Dr. Borack regarding outstanding fees by the (mother). He informed that (the father) has paid his portion of the bill. This is also something that will have to be addressed by (the mother)."

Dominic J. Mastruserio Co., L.P.A.
From a 3-13-01 letter to the mother's attorney
and cc to Dr. Michael Borack

Who needs a collections agent when you have the abuser's attorney getting it done? Seriously, that was very thoughtful and very much appreciated - by Borack.

"I have recommended that I review information from the involved clinicians, interview each litigant and review whatever documentation they wish to provide, and conduct a home or office visit wherein I meet with each parent and the involved children. I also would like to spend time with each child separately."

Michael Borack excerpt 3-26-01

Michael Borack is not an expert in assessing children as to whether or not they have been sexually abused. Why would he want to "spend time" with the children? Was Borack hoping to put the toothpaste back into the tube? Of course he was. So transparent.

New York Investigative Writer

Karen Winner Interviews

& Fights Dr. Michael Borack

Michael Borack was interviewed on 3-27-01 by New York investigative journalist and author Karen Winner. The interview turned into a physical confrontation as Dr. Michael Borack seized, then destroyed the audiotape 45 minutes into the interview.

Dr. Borack threw the audiotape into the trash and blocked Ms. Winner's access to it. Ms. Winner sustained scratches and has a witness to the scuffle.

Hamilton County's Jayne Zuberbuhler

Causes The Mother's Attorney To Quit

After his physical confrontation with New York author Karen Winner, Dr. Michael Borack complained bitterly about it to Jayne Zuberbuhler, the Supervisor of the Hamilton County Parenting Division. The tall Michael Borack had destroyed the petite journalist Karen Winner's audiotape, scratching her in the process.
The next morning, Jayne Zuberbuhler unexpectedly summoned the mother's Cincinnati attorney, William Abernethy, into her office where he was shown brochures of Karen Winner's book

In the impromptu meeting with Zuberbuhler, it was represented to the mother's attorney that his client was apparently mounting an attack on PAS psychologist Michael Borack and PAS Judge Ronald Panioto.

The mother's attorney Bill Abernethy left the meeting, and a few hours later, without even hearing the Winner side of the Borack interview and scuffle, withdrew from the case. Abernethy had been previously advised that Karen Winner was coming to Cincinnati to conduct interviews, and had himself received written permission to speak with Ms. Winner. Like a deer caught in the headlights, Billy boy cut and run.

As a direct result of Panioto aide Jayne Zuberbuhler's interference with the mother's attorney, and at a very critical juncture in this case, following the Boat & Olafson Reports, the mother lost her legal representation. Of course that was probably a good thing, because the last thing Bill Abernethy is, is a trial attorney. A fella needs steady legs for that.

Dr. Borack's Letter of Recusal

"It has come to my attention that one of the parties in the above captioned case has engaged the services of a private investigator who is, under false pretenses, seeking information into both my professional and private life. (The mother) has also filed a licensing board complaint against me.

These actions place me under duress as that term is used in connection with Ohio Revised Code Statue 4732.17 (et seq), and as such, I can not guarantee, nor could I ever satisfactorily prove that from this point forward, I would be fully impartial in my activities on this case. As such, my ability to provide services in this matter is impaired, and I can no longer be the psychologist of choice. I hereby recuse myself from this case."

The Ohio State Board of Psychology

State Board of Psychology
Jeff D. Sherrill, Ph.D.
excerpt dated 9-26-01

"While your complaint highlighted a number of the APA's Ethical Principals that you believed Dr. Borack may have violated, please be advised that we were unable to determine that the psychologist's conduct constituted a violation of any specific law or rule governing psychologists in Ohio."

In other words, ethical principles and Ohio law are not one and the same. Entirely possible for an Ohio psychologist to break most of the APA ethical codes and still not run afoul of the Ohio State Board of Psychology. Unless a fella steals money or has sex with a client, he can do the shit Borack does.

State of Ohio
Licensing Records

On his 1998 and 2000 Ohio State licensing board applications, Michael Borack answered the same question differently:

When and where did Michael Borack ever acquire this sudden expertise?

Did Dr. Borack anticipate needing this expertise to discredit Dr. Jacqueline Kowalski, the play therapy expert that he failed to even meet?

Dr. Borack wouldn't make something up, would he? Of course he would. Ask Kentucky, they disciplined Borack for fabricating an evaluation on a man he never met. (That might be fun to read.)

To Face An Accuser

Without even ruling on a motion previously submitted by Michael Borack to quash his deposition, Judge Ronald Panioto attempted to convene a trial in August 2001. He wanted to stick it quick to the mother who involved a reporter. Lot's of people showed up. What a waste of everyone's time and money.

The mother's new attorney Richard Ducote enlightened Judge Ronald Panioto that his client had a constitutional right to first depose the Hamilton County Domestic Relations Court Parental Alienation Psychologist - Michael Borack. Panioto retreated from stepping on this woman's constitutional rights - for awhile anyway.

Michael Borack, forced by constitutional law into deposition, did not survive it.

Borack finally admitted in deposition -

Michael Borack Psy.D.
Hamilton County court appointed psychologist
In Deposition November 2, 2001

Richard Ducote Question:
"As I understand it, you say you're not expert in assessing whether or not a child has been sexually abused, in fact, but you are an expert in assessing whether or not sexual abuse allegations are false; is that a fair statement?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "An incomplete statement, but fair in its statement."

Richard Ducote Question:
"You don't see that that makes no sense?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "Well, clearly, I see it makes no sense to you."¬Ý

Uh?

more

Richard Ducote Question: "Do you know Bette Gillman?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "No, I don't."

Richard Ducote Question: "You don't know that name, Betty Gilman?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "I know the name. I don't know her."

Richard Ducote Question: "Have you ever had any discussions with her about this case?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "No. I reviewed her -- As reviewed per my report, but otherwise, I've had no connection with her."

Richard Ducote Question: "Is her report something that you relied on?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "A piece, yes."

Richard Ducote Question: "Are you aware that Bette Gillman settled a civil lawsuit brought on behalf of children who alleged malpractice for her diagnosing parental alienation syndrome and that she was subjected to disciplinary proceedings for diagnosing parental alienation syndrome in children?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "Wow, no, I was not aware of that."

Richard Ducote Question: "Now, you relied a lot on another psychologist, a gentleman who had had his own little problems with the licensing board, did you not, Michael?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "No. Jim Kelly."

Richard Ducote Question: "Dr. Kelly?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "I did not rely upon him, I think you said 'a lot,' so I would disagree with that."

more

Richard Ducote Question: "How many times have you testified in court that you believe children have been sexually abused?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "I don't even know that I could answer that question. I would never actually testify that I know for certain either way, and I can't recall."

Richard Ducote Question: "Have you ever rendered an opinion in any court of law that you believe --"

Dr. Michael Borack: "That a child was at risk or might have been molested, et cetera?"

Richard Ducote Question: "Yes."

Dr. Michael Borack: "Yes."

Richard Ducote Question: "Do you know about how many times?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "I couldn't begin to count."

Richard Ducote Question: "Do you know when the last time was?"

Dr. Michael Borack: "Not off the top of my head, no."

Mr. Thibodeaux's parents unfortunately have passed away. He has only one surviving sibling, an older homosexual brother, who had once been arrested for masturbating in a New Orleans department store restroom while spying on men peeing.

Now imagine this man babysitting your child? Panioto & Borack have no problem imagining it. Because of Borack, Panioto & Shattuck, Mr. Thibodeaux's brother is able to see the children more frequently than their protective mother, who is now helpless to safeguard her children from him.

When the little boy in this case was just shy of three years old, he disclosed possible sexual abuse of him by Mr. Thibodeaux's brother. What happened is that the mother and father in this case had gone out for the evening in New Orleans leaving the boy in the care of the paternal grandmother, who in turn left the boy in the care of the boy's uncle and his boyfriend. The boy woke up in the middle of that night distraught and inconsolable.

Sensing something wrong, the mother caught the first flight home in the morning to Cincinnati with her son, leaving the father behind. Once in Cincinnati, the boy revealed that his uncle and the uncle's boyfriend had stripped naked - and had done the same to him. Upon returning home from the store, Mr. Thibodeaux's mother encountered the situation and chased her grown naked son and his boyfriend from the house, throwing pillows and anything else she could find at the two alleged perverts. They ran scooping up their clothes as they hustled out the back door.

Now here is what the Hamilton County PAS psychologist Dr. Michael Borack, a non-expert in child sexual abuse, wrote about the incident, turning it against the Mother.

"Mrs. Thibodeaux said that when her mother asked (the little boy) what he had done during his trip, he answered that he and his Uncle had 'pee-peed' on each other. This is quite an unusual statement. If (the boy) had indeed said this, it certainly would be cause for concern and further questioning. But, young children do say odd things, so an experienced parent would know to investigate the matter further before reaching absolute conclusions. Mrs. Thibodeaux said she, 'ran upstairs and had the dry heaves.' Again, this account gives one an uneasy sense. It sounds unnatural and melodramatic."

Dr. Michael Borack excerpt 4-23-00

Actually, Mr. Borack's reaction is unnatural. Only after the fact did everyone learn his true melodramatic, fabricating nature. Borack should be flipping burgers, not writing psychological evaluations.

Of Sociopaths, Artful Manipulators

And Superb Balance

"(The father) did come across as mildly defensive - but this is an appropriate stance for someone in his circumstances. Had he been highly defensive, this would have been suspicious in and of itself, {as the guilty - excepting sociopaths - usually project that guilt into a sense of being attacked}. However, had he been completely at ease and non-defensive, this too would have raised some suspicion. ... Altogether, (the father) would have to be a remarkably artful manipulator to strike such a superb balance. It is not easy for perpetrators to dupe someone who is highly trained and experienced with identifying their manipulation and deceit."

Dr. Michael Borack excerpt 4-23-00

Webmaster Comment:

If a pedophile doesn't come right out and admit it, no psychologist, especially non-experts like Borack, can ethically state that it didn't happen based upon sessions with the accused.

There are no psychological tests that can be performed on an alleged child molester that can prove the person did not molest a child nor predict that a person will not in the future.

True experts in the field know that child molesters are notoriously cunning and persuasive. It is how they lure their victims and hide their crime.

As for artful manipulation, Mr. Thibodeaux had in fact once cleverly duped the Hamilton County Parenting Division in December 1997 into believing that Mrs. Thibodeaux had visited a psychiatrist several times. In doing so, Mr. Thibodeaux insinuated that the mother was unstable and must be crazy.

To prove his point, Mr. Thibodeaux waved an insurance bill in front of the Hamilton County Parenting Specialist which showed that Mrs. Thibodeaux was the policy holder for the psychiatrist visits. But Mrs. Thibodeaux had never visited a psychiatrist. She could not explain the insurance bill to the Specialist, who just inches from the mother's face barked, "Explain this". Her inability to do so resulted in more favorable treatment from the Parenting Division toward Mr. Thibodeaux and probably caused them to believe that she was less than honest, when in fact it was the opposite.

Three months later and after the Specialist wrote her "Alienation" report to the Court, the mother finally received the insurance company documents pertaining to the controversial psychiatrist sessions. The documents revealed that the psychiatry firm's patient for all the sessions was ... Dr. Louis Thibodeaux.

The Hamilton County Parenting Division went on to allow as the visitation supervisor Mr. Thibodeaux's then girlfriend, Kelly Reichert, who would become his second wife and third mother to a third and fourth son (you need a scorecard).

Mr. Thibodeaux correctly described the Parenting Division rules as a "joke" as he openly complained that the Hamilton County Parenting Division had set no guidelines as to who could supervise an alleged child molester? On that, he probably has a point.

Given the alleged lack of direction, Mr. Thibodeaux chose a woman he described to Dr. Jacqueline Kowalski in December 1997 as his "lover".

Despite having lived together for several months, on February 3, 1998, while testifying as Mr. Thibodeaux''s visitation supervisor, and in his favor, the future second wife denied under oath that a romantic or sexual relationship existed between them with these answers:

"Absolutely not." and "I'm not following Monica Lewinsky here."

Kelly Reichert admitted to doing Mr. Thibodeaux's laundry and baking cookies for him. She also stayed overnight in the home even when the children were not present. Now that's one heckuva supervisor.

Despite this, Mr. Thibodeaux incredibly denied that he ever told Dr. Kowalski that his visitation supervisor was his "lover" and repeated under oath his second wife's unbelievable story. Denying the obvious, Louis Thibodeaux basically called the therapist, who is a nun, a liar.

Imagine that - calling a nun a liar and expecting people to believe you instead? Who is telling the truth here?

Would Mr. Thibodeaux, who had numerous adulterous affairs, abstain for several months from having sex with a 29 year old woman with whom he was sharing his home and who would later coincidentally become his second wife?

Or is the nun telling the truth?

If you're Borack, you believe Louis & Kelly Thibodeaux.

But you're not Borack, are you?